Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

More rants ....

  • 30th Sep, 2008 at 2:11 PM
penalty
Further to this cheery little post I received a chirpy answerphone message from some woman from nPower's Complaints department saying "We've checked our records and nothing is wrong, so we've closed your complaint".

Which is lovely, and I'm glad that she's so happy, but when my complaint is that their records are at fault, using them as the method of determining whether or not my complaint is valid or not, and therefore whether it needs to be actioned or not is a little stupid, no?

It will surprise no-one that I have been on hold for 20 minutes without talking to a human being yet. But it's okay, because "my call is important to us".

Do they not realise that the longer I'm on hold, the more shit they're going to get? Surely someone in the call centre business has worked out that simple equation?

I would consider going to the watchdogs about this, but frankly, they're EnergyWatch whose website is at http://www.energywatch.org.uk/

Anyone following that link will see why I'm not holding out great hopes for them to be my best advocate.

Edit to add, mostly as a note to myself: Having spoken to the lovely Sandra, who was the person who left the message for me this morning (What are the chances of that? It's almost like their complaints department is only a couple of people!) and having been on the phone from 13:48 to 14:38 (of which 40 minutes was me explaining to her the exact same things I explained to the person I talked to on 12th August) nothing has moved forwards in the last 6 weeks because my complaint was in a queue.

She has promised:

1. To send me the NPower complaints policy
2. Once the matter is resolved, to compensate me for both the cost of my phone calls and my time wasted over this matter.
3. To pass the details on to the cross metering department so that they can arrange an appointment to visit and see that the meters are different
4. To make a note that if the matter is not moved forward significantly in the next 6 weeks (Which makes it noon on 11th November 2008) that I have told NPower that's the point I'll be contacting Energywatch.

Further Edit: Sandra has rung back and found that the meter I claim is in my basement is actually on my records, and that when they changed my account number, that somehow the meter serial number got mis-assigned. This speeds things up considerably as they now don't have to send someone out, but can just re-calculate my bill. She's now estimating 2 - 3 weeks for resolution for that. That's the 21st October. I look forward with interest to the resolution.

Tags:

Comments

[info]valkyriekaren wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:15 (UTC)
Energywatch closed down during the last departmental reshuffle - anything to do with consumer complaints (for whatever industry) is now handled by www.consumerdirect.gov.uk

(details of the changeover on the OfGem site, if you're interested: http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Consumers/Complain/Pages/Complain.aspx)
[info]jfs wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 16:16 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll direct my complaints consumerwatchwards then.
[info]maleghast wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:22 (UTC)
I never cease to be amused by valid domains that lead to default Virtual Server pages - you'd think that a public body could spring for dedicated hosting (at least), or that the government would host their site on a box administered by the Civil Service, rather than a cheap-ass shared hosting account... Hold on a minute, I think I may be on the wrong side of this argument ;-)
[info]hekai wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 17:49 (UTC)
Did you just suggest that something - specifically something data and I.T. related - should be administered by the Civil Service? Really? ;)
[info]snorkel_maiden wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:27 (UTC)
Apparently if you randomly mash your fingers into the keys they think you are disabled or elderly and you get to queue jump- might be worth a try! I will be next time I ring anyone like that.

But don't get me started on the incompetence of nPower. Really been there, really done that.
[info]thirstypixel wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:27 (UTC)
Following my Pipex experience, my sympathy with people in your position could not be greater. I spent a ridiculous amount of time on hold to them, and not one department was able to transfer me to a human being in another department.
[info]ed_fortune wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:33 (UTC)
Do they not realise that the longer I'm on hold, the more shit they're going to get? Surely someone in the call centre business has worked out that simple equation?

Ah, but they don't give a toss about the poor sod who has to take the call. This is why we need a 'kick your boss in the crotch' day for call centre workers.

[info]maleghast wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:35 (UTC)
Having worked in similar ways, but not quite a call-centre, I can see how this would be an imperative for people who do.

Let's make it happen!
[info]rebby wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 14:13 (UTC)
Even centres in india are having employees leaving in droves as they've realised there's no progression & no pay rises and loads of stress.
[info]hekai wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 18:16 (UTC)
Having been both a call-centre worker and a call-centre worker's boss, I share the sentiment, but can't quite accept the solution. The real problem is that issues only ever escalate individually - one customer has to chase one issue intensively, for one 'resolution' that often involves some sort of payoff that the front-line would've been castrated for even suggesting. Broad trends in complaints are examined relatively rarely, and general feedback from customers falls on deaf ears, instead of being treated as useful market research. It's all just damage-limitation, not customer service.

What works is a hierarchy in which each level actively listens to the one below, specifically so that general concerns filter up the chain - the way helplines are supposed to work. Radical, I know, but it makes people want to work for you, instead of brooding all day about how to get retribution... ;)
[info]thalinoviel wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 19:47 (UTC)
Seconded. Also I feel there should be a day when you can legally beat salespeople for lying.
[info]caddyman wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:43 (UTC)
Ah yes.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works...

Time for the Hatchet Man.
[info]invisible_al wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:54 (UTC)
You could try emailing or writing to their CEO, it works as a last resort with BT. This yahoo answer http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080630074505AAWv65Q says that it's andy.duff@rwenpower.com. Might be worth giving it a go.
[info]invisible_al wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 13:57 (UTC)
Failing that you could write to

Andrew Duff
RWE Npower plc
Windmill Hill Business
Park
Whitehill Way
Swindon
Wiltshire SN5 6PB
[info]jfs wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 16:17 (UTC)
*grin*

Thank you. I'll bear that in mind.
[info]westernind wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 17:59 (UTC)
What about whapping them with a subject access request under the Data Protection Act? Admittedly they have 40 days (iirc) to respond, but it should put the wind up them.
[info]sixtine wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 19:24 (UTC)
Auspicious date. I hope that will be the end of your battle. You should have shaved an hour and made it 11am.
[info]captainweasel wrote:
30th Sep, 2008 20:23 (UTC)
As I kind of work in a large utilities* records juggling department I sympathize both ways - it's scarily easy to bugger the numbers up, especially of flats and things, and if common sense doesn't catch it right away the errors compound.
you've just got to keep on at them, keep calling and each time make sure they have the right account number, that it's linked to the right meter number and the right name and address.
But NPower are universally a bit crap.

*that recently drove a pensioner to attempt suicide with electricity bills
[info]captainweasel wrote:
11th Oct, 2008 19:19 (UTC)
any joy with http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/ ? they went live recently

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com